Prediction of Mateusz Terczynski vs Dmytro Badanov Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Terczynski vs D. Badanov

Mateusz Terczynski
POL
l
l
w
w
l
w
l
w
l
w
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
29
Age
37
6'3" (191 cm)
Height
6'1" (185 cm)
0
C. Rank
Ret.
0
Best Rank
463
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Dmytro Badanov
UKR
l
w
l
w
l
l
l
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
29
Age
37
6'3" (191 cm)
Height
6'1" (185 cm)
0
C. Rank
Ret.
0
Best Rank
463
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Terczynski 1 - 0 Badanov
They have played 1 sets in total, with Mateusz Terczynski winning 1 and Dmytro Badanov winning 0. The last match between Mateusz Terczynski and Dmytro Badanov was at the Egypt F32, 08-11-2016, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Mateusz Terczynski getting the victory 5-0 ret..
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Terczynski | 1 |
| Badanov | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Egypt F32(11-08-16)
Mateusz Terczynski
5
Dmytro Badanov
0
M. Terczynski vs D. Badanov H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 43.18% (114-150) | Career Total W/L | 50.22% (112-111) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 0 | Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Terczynski vs D. Badanov Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mateusz Terczynski has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Dmytro Badanov has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mateusz Terczynski, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Dmytro Badanov has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mateusz Terczynski has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Dmytro Badanov has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mateusz Terczynski has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Dmytro Badanov winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mateusz Terczynski has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 63/74), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/3). Dmytro Badanov has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 46% (W/L 13/9), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 44% (W/L 48/60).
- Player level: In the last year, Mateusz Terczynski has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Dmytro Badanov has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mateusz Terczynski winning 0 times and Dmytro Badanov being victorious 0 times. They have played 1 sets in total, with Mateusz Terczynski winning 1 and Dmytro Badanov winning 0.
- The last match between Mateusz Terczynski and Dmytro Badanov was at the Egypt F32, 08-11-2016, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Mateusz Terczynski getting the victory 5-0 ret..
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:22:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mateusz Terczynski has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Dmytro Badanov has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mateusz Terczynski has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Dmytro Badanov has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mateusz Terczynski has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Dmytro Badanov has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Mateusz Terczynski vs Dmytro Badanov Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Terczynski vs D. Badanov H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 5 | Games Won | 0 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 0:22:0 | Average Match Time | 0:22:0 |
| 58% (7/12) | 1st Serve % | 47% (14/30) |
| 86% (6/7) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (8/14) |
| 60% (3/5) | 2nd Serve Win % | 25% (4/16) |
| 50% (3/6) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/1) |
| 60% (18/30) | Return Points Win % | 25% (3/12) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Terczynski 0%, Badanov 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Terczynski 0%, Badanov 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Terczynski 0%, Badanov 0%.
M. Terczynski Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | L | 6-1 6-4 | ||
Q2 | W | 6-4 6-1 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-0 6-2 | ||
R2 | L | 6-1 6-1 | ||
R1 | W | 6-1 6-3 | ||
D. Badanov Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-1 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 6-7(2) 6-4 6-2 | ||
Q2 | L | 4-2 ret. | ||
Q2 | L | 5-5 ret. | ||
Q2 | L | 6-3 3-1 ret. | ||

M. Terczynski vs D. Badanov Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 43.18% (114/150) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.22% (112/111) |
| 45.35% (273/329) | Sets Win/Loss | 51.53% (253/238) |
| 49.04% (2714/2820) | Games Win/Loss | 50.39% (2262/2227) |
| 46.15% (42/49) | Hard Win/Loss | 44.44% (48/60) |
| 45.99% (63/74) | Clay Win/Loss | 55.81% (48/38) |
| 27.27% (9/24) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55.17% (16/13) |
| 0.00% (0/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 307 | Aces Total | 171 |
| 0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 |
| 348 | Total Double Faults | 219 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 360.86 | Average Opponent Rank | 505.18 |
| 63% (5191/8204) | 1st Serve % | 54% (2497/4605) |
| 63% (3290/5191) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (1620/2497) |
| 48% (1436/3013) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (951/2108) |
| 39% (257/654) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (187/426) |
| 37% (2863/7767) | Return Points Win % | 39% (1780/4521) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.00% (0/5) | Challenger W/L | 33.33% (2/4) |
| 44.19% (114/144) | Futures W/L | 50.93% (110/106) |
| 43% (112/262) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (112/217) |
| 46% (24/52) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (29/55) |
| 36% (27/75) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (24/52) |
| 79% (128/101) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (115/99) |
| 21% (128/27) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (115/16) |
| 9% (136/12) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (107/14) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
12:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction12:05 AM 18/11/25
Prediction12:05 AM 18/11/25
Prediction08:30 AM 18/11/25
Prediction04:00 AM 18/11/25
Prediction12:00 PM 18/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Ella Seidel vs Hanne Vandewinkel Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Sinner H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
22:00
H2H 0-0
00:05
H2H 0-0
00:05
H2H 0-0
01:45
H2H 0-0
02:00
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Heraklion
Greece